Selections from FM GALICIA

16.12

While I was still a student in the Department of Biology, I realized that biology itself provides as much a fundamental foundation for edu­cation, for a worldview, and for comprehending philosophical forma­tions, logical constructions, and even artistic creations and metaphors, as does, perhaps, linguistics. Simply put, biology can be the basis for everything the mind requires. But today I met up with a former class­mate, whom I had not seen for many years—a fellow biologist who had changed professions and was now informing me about a whole system of observations he had made concerning the influence of various bio­logical sciences on the psyche.

Entomologists (insect specialists) always become collectors. Moreover, they are collectors by nature—they collect everything, even experiences and emotions, which they carefully systematize. Botanists are a varied sort. Some almost become philologists, others become eru­dite practical workers—gardeners, horticulturists, mushroom-pickers, floriculturists—while the rest become experts of every corner of a cer­tain region. They know exactly where everything grows.

A separate category is made up of all who work with a microscope. Herpetologists, ichthyologists, and physiologists constitute another bunch of weirdos. But completely apart from all of these are ornithol­ogists—those who study birds. To decide to become an ornithologist is already a sign of an unstable psyche. Ornithologists can be recognized immediately and unmistakably. They are unique. Something pulls them from the earth up into heaven. They probably corral birds into God-knows what and travel somewhere with these harnesses. Ornithologists do not see the ground—only the sky, the tree tops. These are their roots. Just think about it: to count, based on their contours, flocks composed of thousands as they move; to plot paths between us and Africa; to put a ring on captured birds’ legs and receive telegrams from the island of Java, should one of those birds happen to die there; to be able to differentiate between twenty shades of pink in the tiny feathers on a little belly. To recognize nests and eggs of various sizes and colors. To constantly look into binoculars, lorgnettes, and clear tubes. To know which trolley will get you to see a certain migrating flock on time. All these things do not lead to a normal psychic state.

I know this from my own experiences of co-existing with birds: thrushes would nibble on bushes of berries, and I would then gather them; crows always sat on the building outside my window; spar­rows would not allow swallows into their nests on my balcony; a rook drowned in my bucket of water; a crow lived with me for a while; my kids found a frozen parrot that later flew freely around my house; a stork fell, weakened by a long flight, while I was on my post when I was in the army; pigeons that my neighbors would fry up on Saturdays; a crane that flew to my forest from bombarded Serbia; crows from which I stole nuts in the army… If plants are notions, and animals are pictures, then birds are symbols and signs. I was not surprised that my acquaintance had become a theologian. Because, in some way, birds are similar to angels.

 

Translated by Mark Andryczyk